由于胫骨的血液供应特点、受伤机制及功能的特殊性,使得胫腓骨骨折患者容易出现骨折延迟愈合等症状,极易导致下肢运动功能障碍,严重影响患者的正常生活肢体功能,对于家庭和社会都是一份沉重的负担。有研究表明,在胫腓骨骨折后,尽早进行术后康复训练,可以降低再发骨折风险,缩短病程,促使患者尽早回归正常生活。所以为了协助胫腓骨骨折患者尽快恢复下肢功能,我们研制了一种轻便、价廉、耐用的下肢骨折术后康复支具,以期对其康复有所帮助。
Due to the blood supply characteristics, injury mechanism and special function of the humerus, patients with tibiofibular fractures are prone to symptoms such as delayed fracture healing, which can easily lead to lower limb motor dysfunction, which seriously affects the normal life function of patients, for families and society. It is a heavy burden. Studies have shown that early post-operative rehabilitation training after humeral fractures can reduce the risk of recurrent fractures, shorten the course of disease, and prompt patients to return to normal life as soon as possible. Therefore, in order to assist patients with tibiofibular fractures to restore lower limb function as soon as possible, we have developed a lightweight, inexpensive and durable postoperative rehabilitation device for lower extremity fractures, in order to help their rehabilitation.
胫腓骨骨折,康复训练,康复器材,下肢骨折术后康复支具, Humeral Fracture Rehabilitation Training Rehabilitation Equipment Rehabilitation Instrument for Lower Limb Fracture Surgery精确调节压力的下肢骨折康复支具在胫腓骨骨折康复早期的应用
韩峰,吴琼,李家庆,梁慧,王成盼,秦英瀚,梅英春,颜智. 精确调节压力的下肢骨折康复支具在胫腓骨骨折康复早期的应用Early Application of Lower Limb Fracture Rehabilitation Brace with Precise Pressure Regulation in the Rehabilitation of Tibia and Fibula Fracture[J]. 外科, 2019, 08(01): 5-11. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJS.2019.81002
参考文献References周智, 左文山, 谢跃, 等. 经皮微创钢板与外固定支架治疗Gustilo Ⅱ型胫腓骨骨折比较研究[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2014, 13(11): 1152-1155.Lee, Y.S., Chen, S.H., Lin, J.C., et al. (2009) Surgical Treatment of Distal Tibia Fractures: A Comparison of Medial and Lateral Plating. Orthopedics, 32, 163-169. <br>https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090301-18楼小英. 中西医结合疗法联合康复护理干预胫腓骨骨干双骨折临床研究[J]. 新中医, 2016, 32(2): 202-204.Clelland, S.J., Chauhan, P. and Mandari, F.N. (2016) The Epidemiology and Management of Tibia and Fibula Fractures at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) in Northern Tanzania. Pan African Medical Journal, 21, 51-52.李华. 护理干预对单侧多功能外固定支架治疗胫腓骨骨折患者术后疗效的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2011, 9(32): 416-418.徐欣, 于颖, 顾玲, 等. 外固定支架治疗胫腓骨骨折的临床疗效及护理体会[J]. 大家健康(学术版), 2014, 8(10): 247.史天林, 高占良, 宋小龙. 锁定加压钢板外置在胫腓骨骨折治疗中的应用[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2014, 29(S1): 33-34.张晓玉. 伤残辅助器具装配指南[M]. 北京: 中国人事出版社, 2006: 1-5.陈丽华, 吕亚, 张彩娟. 胫腓骨骨折早期应用冰袋冷敷的疗效观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(24): 225-226.韦晨晖. 外固定支架和交锁髓内钉治疗胫腓骨骨折的疗效观察[J]. 白求恩医学杂志, 2014, 12(1): 34-35.田敏, 孙磊, 魏嵬, 等. 有限扩髓交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨闭合性粉碎性骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2003(14): 9-11.吴铮, 任静, 刘克廷, 等. 外固定架固定治疗开放性胫腓骨骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2018, 33(8): 859-860.黄武君, 裘曙文, 何勇. 132例胫腓骨开放性骨折创口感染回顾性分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2011, 21(14): 2918-2920.陈启明. 骨科基础科学(骨关节肌肉系统生物学和生物力学) [M]. 第2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2001: 121-127.王海峰, 许玲聪, 马琴飞, 等. 开放性胫腓骨骨折术后感染的病原菌分布及VSD联合外固定架治疗的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(6): 1333-1336.钟波涛, 李国权, 赖有娣. 胫腓骨骨折术后康复治疗体会[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2011, 31(4): 592-593.张晓玉. 我国智能辅助器具科技创新的现状与发展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(5): 401-403.Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B.J. and Krebs, H.I. (2008) Effect of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 111-121.Mehrholz, J., Werner, C., Kugler, J., et al. (2007) Electronmechanical-Assisted Training for Walking after Stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, 61-85.Masia, L., Krebs, H.I., Cappa, P., et al. (2007) Design and Characterization of Hand Module for Whole-Arm Rehabili-tation Following Stroke. Transactions on Mechatronics, 12, 399-407.张晓玉, 王凯旋. 机器人辅助技术、康复机器人与智能辅具[J]. 中国康复, 2013, 28(4): 246-248.张晓玉. 智能辅具及其应用[M]. 北京: 中国社会出版社, 2012: 1-2.平伟. 助行机器人研究发展和展望[J]. 机器人技术与应用, 2009, 5(1): 31-32.张晓玉. 个人移动辅助器具的分类、现状和未来目标[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2010, 25(9): 885-888.海志凡. 膝关节练功器的研制与使用[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(A1): 227-228.王国新, 江钟立, 李涛, 等. 髌骨骨折后影响屈膝功能恢复的相关因素分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2001(4): 31-32.杨灿军, 陈鹰, 路雨祥. 人机一体化智能系统理论及应用研究探索[J]. 机械工程学报, 2000, 6(36): 12-15.饶玲军. 康复机器人研究综述[J]. 世界康复工程与器械, 2011: 62.薛渊, 吕广明. 下肢康复助行机构本体设计及运动学分析[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2006(5): 131-133.玉春妹, 彭艳红, 蒋桂香, 等. 精准负重在胫腓骨骨折术后康复中的临床护理研究[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018, 5(59): 124-125.