﻿ 利用同异联系势分析法综合评价谷子新品种豫谷20和豫谷21 Comprehensive Evaluation of New Millet Varieties Yugu 20 and Yugu 21 by the Similarity-Difference Connection Trend Analysis Method

Hans Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Vol. 09  No. 04 ( 2019 ), Article ID: 29920 , 5 pages
10.12677/HJAS.2019.94039

Comprehensive Evaluation of New Millet Varieties Yugu 20 and Yugu 21 by the Similarity-Difference Connection Trend Analysis Method

Hongshan Yan, Huifang Xie, Menghan Wei, Lu Xing, Yang Zhang, Nan Fu, Yanhong Zhang

Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang Henan

Received: Apr. 6th, 2019; accepted: Apr. 19th, 2019; published: Apr. 26th, 2019

ABSTRACT

The foxtail millet varieties of the national regional tests of Millet Varieties from 2012 to 2013 Summer Valley Regions in North China were analyzed by the similarity-difference connection trend analysis method. The results indicated that 7 varieties showed the strong identical trend, and 4 varieties showed the weak identical trend. It was pointed out that in future breeding work, Yugu 20 and Yugu 21 should be utilized according to their different characteristics.

Keywords:Foxtail Millet, Similarity-Difference Connection Trend Analysis Method, Yugu 20, Yugu 21

1. 引言

2. 材料与方法

2.1. 材料

Table 1. From 2012 to 2013, the data of national grain variety regional test in north China summer valley group were summarized

2.2. 方法

2.2.1. 选择参评性状，整理试验数据

2.2.2. 确定理想品种各性状的理想值

2.2.3. 确定各性状的权重值

2.2.4. 计算各参试品种各性状与理想品种理想值的同一度矩阵

$P=\left[\begin{array}{cccccccccccccc}0.9558& 0.9726& 0.9271& 0.9898& 0.9867& 0.9365& 0.9413& 0.5000& 0.5000& 0.3333& 0.5000& 0.4828& 0.6228& 0.4924\\ 0.9572& 0.9935& 0.8876& 0.9913& 0.9831& 0.9197& 0.8824& 0.5000& 0.5000& 0.3333& 0.5000& 0.8000& 0.2849& 0.2851\\ 0.9362& 0.8976& 0.8931& 0.9482& 0.9548& 0.9465& 0.6190& 1.0000& 0.5000& 0.3333& 0.5000& 0.5000& 0.3701& 0.4545\\ 0.9474& 0.8932& 0.8747& 0.9734& 0.9791& 0.9866& 0.7143& 1.0000& 0.5000& 0.3333& 0.5000& 0.6222& 0.4177& 0.8333\\ 1.0000& 0.8814& 1.0000& 1.0000& 1.0000& 0.9465& 0.8095& 1.0000& 0.5000& 0.2500& 0.3333& 0.2917& 1.0000& 0.8125\\ 0.9697& 0.8856& 0.8794& 0.9987& 0.9904& 1.0000& 0.7619& 1.0000& 1.0000& 0.3333& 0.5000& 1.0000& 0.7647& 0.6771\\ 0.9139& 0.8264& 0.8651& 0.9842& 0.9746& 0.9164& 0.5000& 1.0000& 1.0000& 0.3333& 0.3333& 0.3237& 0.4541& 1.0000\end{array}\right]$

2.2.5. 计算各参试品种与理想品种的综合同一度、差异度及各参试品种的联系度

2.2.6. 计算各参试品种与理想品种的联系势值

2.2.7. 对各参试品种进行联系势测验并进行评定

3. 结果与分析

3.1. 依据各参试品种的联系度进行优劣顺序

Table 2. From 2012 to 2013, the regional test of national millet varieties was carried out

*字母相同表示联系势相同，说明品种间无显著差异；字母相异，表示联系势相异，说明品种间差异显著。

3.2. 各参试品种联系势测验结果

4. 结论与讨论

Comprehensive Evaluation of New Millet Varieties Yugu 20 and Yugu 21 by the Similarity-Difference Connection Trend Analysis Method[J]. 农业科学, 2019, 09(04): 253-257. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2019.94039

1. 1. 2012~2013年国家谷子品种区域试验(华北夏谷区组)汇总总结[R]. 全国农业技术推广服务中心: 全国谷子品种鉴定委员会, 2013.

2. 2. 郭瑞林, 杨春玲, 关立, 侯军红, 王阔, 宋志均, 何明亮, 贾海庆. 小麦品种区域试验的同异分析方法研究[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2001, 21(3): 60-63.

3. 3. 郭瑞林. 同异分析的联系势测验及其在小麦品种区域试验中的应用[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(1): 63-65.