Pure Mathematics
Vol. 14  No. 02 ( 2024 ), Article ID: 81420 , 12 pages
10.12677/PM.2024.142054

基于三次函数不等式的时变时滞系统 稳定性分析

樊天娇,杨艳梅

华北理工大学理学院,河北 唐山

收稿日期:2023年12月28日;录用日期:2024年1月10日;发布日期:2024年2月28日

摘要

时滞系统的稳定性分析一直是学术研究的焦点。本文采用Lyapunov-Krasovskii泛函(LKF)方法,对时变时滞系统的稳定性进行了深入研究,并提出了一个互凸三次矩阵不等式。首先,利用辅助函数积分不等式和互凸三次矩阵不等式,对LKF导数中的积分项进行了有效估计。随后,基于三次函数负定方法,以线性矩阵不等式(LMI)的形式给出了时变时滞系统渐近稳定的稳定性准则,以确保系统的稳定性。最后,通过数值例子,验证了所提出方法的可行性和优越性。

关键词

时滞系统,稳定性,三次不等式,积分不等式

Stability Analysis of Time-Varying Time-Delay Systems Based on Cubic Function Inequality

Tianjiao Fan, Yanmei Yang

College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan Hebei

Received: Dec. 28th, 2023; accepted: Jan. 10th, 2024; published: Feb. 28th, 2024

ABSTRACT

The stability analysis of time-delay systems has always been a focus of academic research. This article adopts the Lyapunov Krasovskii functional (LKF) method to conduct in-depth research on the stability of time-varying time-delay systems, and proposes a mutually convex cubic matrix inequality. Firstly, the integral terms in the LKF derivative are effectively estimated using the auxiliary function integral inequality and the convex cubic matrix inequality. Subsequently, based on the negative definite method of cubic functions, a stability criterion for asymptotic stability of time-varying time-delay systems is presented in the form of linear matrix inequality (LMI) to ensure the stability of the system. Finally, the feasibility and superiority of the proposed method are verified through numerical examples.

Keywords:Time Delayed Systems, Stability, Cubic Inequality, Integral Inequality

Copyright © 2024 by author(s) and Hans Publishers Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

1. 引言

时滞系统的稳定性分析是控制领域的一个重要研究方向。时滞对系统的稳定性造成了一些不可避免的挑战,例如时滞的存在会限制系统的稳定性,这使得时滞系统的稳定性分析更加复杂。因此,在时滞的最大允许范围内,确保系统仍能保持稳定运行至关重要。近年来,时变时滞系统的稳定性分析引起了许多研究人员的广泛关注,并取得了许多研究成果 [1] - [20] 。如,文献 [11] 基于Jensen不等式提出了Wirtinger不等式,用于获得时滞系统的稳定性;文献 [13] 提出贝塞尔–勒让德不等式,研究了时变时滞系统的时滞相关稳定性。时变时滞系统的稳定性分析中,主流方法是Lyapunov-Krasovskii泛函(LKF)方法 [21] ,相关研究主要从构造适当的LKF与严格估计LKF的时间导数两个方面进行考虑。

LKF的时间导数中的积分项通常采用积分不等式来估计,如Jensen不等式、Wirtinger不等式 [11] [12] 、贝塞尔–勒让德不等式 [13] 、二重积分不等式 [14] [15] 以及其它改进的积分不等式 [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] 等。积分不等式用于估计积分项虽有效但也会出现一个新问题,即估计得到的项具有非凸性。为了应对这个问题,学者们提出了诸多互凸方法,例如,Park等人提出了逆凸引理(Reciprocally Convex Lemma,简称RCL) [22] ;Zhang等人提出了参数相关的互凸矩阵不等式 [23] [24] ;Zeng等人提出了互凸二次矩阵不等式 [25] ;Yang等人提出了参数相关的互凸矩阵不等式,其中包含了更多自由矩阵、时滞二次项以及时滞导数的信息 [20] 。鉴于时变时滞三次项的信息的探索相对较少,自然提出一问题:能否提出一种新的互凸三次矩阵不等式,以获得更为精确的结果,从而避免产生过于保守的结果?

为了获得保守性较低的稳定性准则,研究者们提出了多种构造LKF的方法,如多重积分LKF [26] 、增广LKF [12] 以及时滞乘积LKF [27] 等。此外,有时候构造LKF需要借助新颖的积分不等式和互凸不等式来完成。LKF的构造方式、积分项的估计、凸式的估计以及不等式的处理技巧等因素都可能对稳定性准则的保守性产生影响。在推导保守性较低的稳定性准则时,往往会从多个角度改进稳定性分析方法,这导致很难确定哪些因素对结论产生了影响。基于此进一步探讨:能否基于简单的LKF、三阶贝塞尔–勒让德积分不等式等,以研究新提出的互凸三次矩阵不等式能否获得相对保守较小的结果?

在本文中, R n 表示n维列向量, R m × n 表示m行和n列的所有实矩阵的集合,上标T和−1分别表示矩阵的转置和逆,R表示实数集, I n 是n维单位矩阵, 表示对称矩阵中的对称项并且 S y m { X } = X + X T

2. 系统描述

考虑以下具有时变时滞的线性系统:

{ x ˙ ( t ) = A x ( t ) + B x ( t d ( t ) ) , t > 0 x ( t ) = φ ( t ) , t [ h 2 , 0 ] (1)

其中, x ( t ) R n 是状态向量, φ ( t ) R n 是初始值, A , B R n × n 是常数矩阵, h 1 , h 2 是常数,时变可微函数 d ( t ) 满足以下条件:

0 h 1 d ( t ) h 2 . (2)

利用以下引理来推导时变时滞系统的稳定性准则。

引理1 [13] (三阶贝塞尔–勒让德积分不等式):给定任意一个对称正定矩阵 W R n × n ,标量a和b满足 b > a ,对于任一可微向量函数 x : [ a , b ] R n ,有

( b a ) a b x ˙ T ( u ) W x ˙ ( u ) d u [ r 1 T , r 2 T , r 3 T ] [ W 3 W 5 W ] [ r 1 r 2 r 3 ] , (3)

其中,

r 1 = x ( b ) x ( a ) , r 2 = x ( b ) + x ( a ) 2 b a a b x ( u ) d u , r 3 = x ( b ) x ( a ) + 6 b a a b x ( u ) d u 12 ( b a ) 2 a b θ b x ( u ) d u d θ . (4)

引理2 [25] :给定任意一个对称正定矩阵 W R n × n ,标量 α , β ( 0 , 1 ) α + β = 1 ,如果存在实对称矩阵 X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 R n × n ,实矩阵 Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 R n × n ,若

[ W 0 0 W ] α [ X 1 Y 1 0 ] β [ 0 Y 2 X 2 ] α 2 [ X 3 Y 3 0 ] β 2 [ 0 Y 4 X 4 ] 0 , (5)

则以下不等式成立:

[ 1 α W 0 0 1 β W ] [ W + T 1 T 2 W + T 3 ] , (6)

其中, T 1 = β X 1 + α β X 3 T 2 = α Y 1 + β Y 2 + α 2 Y 3 + β 2 Y 4 T 3 = α X 2 + α β X 4

引理3 [28] :令三次函数 f ( s ) = a 0 + a 1 s + a 2 s 2 + a 3 s 3 ,其中, a i R i = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 s [ h 1 , h 2 ] ,对任意 s [ h 1 , h 2 ] ,若满足以下不等式,则 f ( s ) < 0

( i ) f ( h 1 ) < 0 , f ( h 2 ) < 0 , ( ii ) f ( h 1 ) a 2 h 1 2 < 0 , f ( h 2 ) a 2 h 2 2 < 0 , ( iii ) f ( h 1 ) a 3 h 1 3 < 0 , f ( h 2 ) a 3 h 2 3 < 0 , ( iv ) a 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 + f ( h 2 ) ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 ( 2 a 3 h 2 + a 3 h 1 + a 2 ) < 0. (7)

引理4 [29] :令二次函数 f ( s ) = a 0 + a 1 s + a 2 s 2 ,其中, a i R i = 0 , 1 , 2 s [ h 1 , h 2 ] ,对任意 s [ h 1 , h 2 ] ,若满足以下不等式,则 f ( s ) < 0

( i ) f ( h 1 ) < 0 , ( ii ) f ( h 2 ) < 0 , ( iii ) f ( h 1 ) a 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 < 0. (8)

3. 互凸三次矩阵不等式

本节的目的在于推导一个新的互凸矩阵不等式,具体表达如下:

引理5:给定任意一个对称正定矩阵 W R n × n ,标量 α , β ( 0 , 1 ) α + β = 1 ,如果存在实对称矩阵 X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 , X 5 , X 6 R n × n ,实矩阵 Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 , Y 5 , Y 6 R n × n ,若

[ W 0 0 W ] α [ X 1 Y 1 0 ] β [ 0 Y 2 X 2 ] α 2 [ X 3 Y 3 0 ] β 2 [ 0 Y 4 X 4 ] α 3 [ X 5 Y 5 0 ] β 3 [ 0 Y 6 X 6 ] 0 , (9)

则以下不等式成立:

[ 1 α W 0 0 1 β W ] [ W + T 4 T 5 W + T 6 ] , (10)

其中, T 4 = β X 1 + α β X 3 + α 2 β X 5 T 5 = α Y 1 + β Y 2 + α 2 Y 3 + β 2 Y 4 + α 3 Y 5 + β 3 Y 6 T 6 = α X 2 + α β X 4 + α β 2 X 6

证明:将式(9)左右两端分别乘 P T , P ,则得到以下不等式:

P T [ W α X 1 α 2 X 3 α 3 X 5 α Y 1 β Y 2 α 2 Y 3 β 2 Y 4 α 3 Y 5 β 3 Y 6 W β X 2 β 2 X 4 β 3 X 6 ] P 0 , (11)

其中, P = [ 1 α α α 1 α ] 。通过对上述式(11)进行化简和移项,即可完成证明。

注1:不等式(9)的左侧是一个三次函数。为了便于描述,将不等式(9)改写为一般形式,

α 3 [ X 5 Y 5 + Y 6 X 6 ] + α 2 [ X 3 Y 3 Y 4 3 Y 6 X 4 3 X 6 ] + α [ X 1 Y 1 + Y 2 + 2 Y 4 + 3 Y 6 X 2 + 2 X 4 + 3 X 6 ] + [ W Y 2 Y 4 Y 6 W X 2 X 4 X 6 ] 0. (12)

注2:本文所提出的互凸三次矩阵不等式相比许多现有方法更具普适性。例如,当条件 X 5 = 0 , X 6 = 0 , Y 5 = 0 , Y 6 = 0 成立时,所得不等式(10)将演化为引理2;在此基础上,当条件 X 3 = 0 , X 4 = 0 , Y 3 = 0 , Y 4 = 0 成立时,不等式(10)将演化为 [21] 中的引理1。

注3:在引理5中,我们提出了一种互凸三次矩阵不等式,通过引入时变时滞的三次项信息,以获得更为保守的稳定性准则。值得注意的是,这一方法可以适用于各种时滞系统。

4. 稳定性准则

基于引理 [1] [2] [3] [4] ,本文对于时变时滞系统(1)提出了一个具有较低保守性的稳定性准则。为简洁起见,定义以下符号,

ζ ( t ) = [ x T ( t ) x T ( t h 1 ) x T ( t h ( t ) ) x T ( t h 2 ) 1 h 1 t h 1 t x T ( s ) d s 1 h ( t ) h 1 t h ( t ) t h 1 x T ( s ) d s 1 h 2 h ( t ) t h 2 t h ( t ) x T ( s ) d s 1 h 1 2 t h 1 t θ t x T ( s ) d s d θ

1 ( h ( t ) h 1 ) 2 t h ( t ) t h 1 θ t x T ( s ) d s d θ 1 ( h 2 h ( t ) ) 2 t h 2 t h ( t ) θ t h ( t ) x T ( s ) d s d θ t h ( t ) t h 1 x T ( s ) d s t h 2 t h ( t ) x T ( s ) d s ] T , ξ 1 ( t ) = [ x T ( t ) t h 1 t x T ( s ) d s t h 2 t h 1 x T ( s ) d s t h 1 t θ t x T ( s ) d s d θ t h 2 t h 1 θ t h 1 x T ( s ) d s d θ ] T , ξ 2 ( t , s ) = [ x T ( s ) x T ( t ) s t h 1 x T ( θ ) d θ t h 2 s x T ( θ ) d θ ] T , e i = [ 0 n × ( i 1 ) n I n 0 n × ( 12 i ) n ] , i = 1 , 2 , , 12.

定理1 给定标量 h 1 , h 2 ,对于满足式(2)的系统(1)是渐近稳定的,如果存在对称正定矩阵 P R 5 n × 5 n W 1 R n × n W R 4 n × 4 n S 1 , S 2 R n × n ,实对称矩阵 X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 , X 5 , X 6 R 3 n × 3 n ,任意矩阵 Z 1 , Z 2 R 12 n × n Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 , Y 5 , Y 6 R 3 n × 3 n ,使当 h ( t ) [ h 1 , h 2 ] 时,(13)和(14)成立,

Σ 1 = h 3 ( t ) Π 3 + h 2 ( t ) Π 2 + h ( t ) Π 1 + Π 0 , (13)

Ω 1 = h 3 ( t ) Ψ 3 + h 2 ( t ) Ψ 2 + h ( t ) Ψ 1 + Ψ 0 , (14)

其中, P = [ P 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 P 7 P 8 P 9 P 10 P 11 P 12 P 13 P 14 P 15 ] ,其余符号见附录。

证明:构造如下LKF,

V = V 1 ( t ) + V 2 ( t ) + V 3 ( t ) ,

其中,

V 1 ( t ) = ξ 1 T ( t ) P ξ 1 ( t ) , V 2 ( t ) = t h 1 t x T ( s ) W 1 x ( s ) d s + t h 2 t h 1 ξ 2 T ( t , s ) W ξ 2 ( t , s ) d s , V 3 ( t ) = h 1 h 1 0 t + θ t x ˙ T ( s ) S 1 x ˙ ( s ) d s d θ + ( h 2 h 1 ) h 2 h 1 t + θ t x ˙ T ( s ) S 2 x ˙ ( s ) d s d θ ,

V ( t ) 求导有以下结果

V ˙ 1 ( t ) = ζ T ( t ) [ h 2 ( t ) b 2 + h ( t ) b 1 + ( Ξ 1 + b 0 ) ] ζ ( t ) , V ˙ 2 ( t ) = ζ T ( t ) [ h 2 ( t ) ϖ 33 T W L 1 + h ( t ) ϖ 32 T W L 1 + [ e 1 T W 1 e 1 e 2 T W 1 e 2 + ϖ 1 T W ϖ 1 ϖ 2 T W ϖ 2 + s y m { ϖ 31 T W L 1 } ] ζ ( t ) , V ˙ 3 ( t ) = ζ T ( t ) Ξ 2 ζ ( t ) h 1 t h 1 t x ˙ T ( θ ) S 1 x ˙ ( θ ) d θ ( h 2 h 1 ) t h 2 t h 1 x ˙ T ( θ ) S 2 x ˙ ( θ ) d θ ,

利用引理1对积分项进行估计,有

h 1 t h 1 t x ˙ T ( θ ) S 1 x ˙ ( θ ) d θ ζ T ( t ) η 1 T S ˜ 1 η 1 ζ ( t ) ,

( h 2 h 1 ) t h 2 t h 1 x ˙ T ( θ ) S 2 x ˙ ( θ ) d θ = ( h 2 h 1 ) [ t h ( t ) t h 1 x ˙ T ( θ ) S 2 x ˙ ( θ ) d θ + t h 2 t h ( t ) x ˙ T ( θ ) S 2 x ˙ ( θ ) d θ ] ζ T ( t ) [ h 2 h 1 h ( t ) h 1 η 2 T S ˜ 2 η 2 + h 2 h 1 h 2 h ( t ) η 3 T S ˜ 2 η 3 ] ζ ( t ) = ζ T ( t ) [ 1 α η 2 T S ˜ 2 η 2 + 1 β η 3 T S ˜ 2 η 3 ] ζ ( t ) ,

其中, α = h ( t ) h 1 h 2 h 1 β = h 2 h ( t ) h 2 h 1 。根据引理5的结论,有如下凸式估计

ζ T ( t ) [ η 2 T η 3 T ] [ 1 α S ˜ 2 0 0 1 β S ˜ 2 ] [ η 2 η 3 ] ζ ( t ) ζ T ( t ) [ c 3 h 3 ( t ) + c 2 h 2 ( t ) + c 1 h ( t ) + c 0 ] ζ ( t ) ,

综上所述,

V ˙ ( t ) ζ T ( t ) [ h 3 ( t ) c 3 + h 2 ( t ) ( b 2 + c 2 + ϖ 33 T W L 1 ) + h ( t ) ( b 1 + c 1 + ϖ 32 T W L 1 ) + ( Ξ 1 + Ξ 2 + b 0 + c 0 + e 1 T W 1 e 1 e 2 T W 1 e 2 + ϖ 1 T W ϖ 1 ϖ 2 T W ϖ 2 + s y m { ϖ 31 T W L 1 } η 1 T S ˜ 1 η 1 ) ] ζ ( t ) , (15)

对于任意矩阵 Z 1 , Z 2 R 12 n × n ,以下等式成立,

2 ζ T ( t ) [ Z 1 ( ( h ( t ) h 1 ) e 6 e 11 ) + Z 2 ( ( h 2 h ( t ) ) e 7 e 12 ) ] ζ ( t ) = 0 , (16)

将上述等式增加到式(15)中,有

V ˙ ( t ) ζ T ( t ) [ h 3 ( t ) c 3 + h 2 ( t ) ( b 2 + c 2 + ϖ 33 T W L 1 ) + h ( t ) ( b 1 + c 1 + ϖ 32 T W L 1 + s y m { Z 1 e 6 Z 2 e 7 } ) + ( Ξ 1 + Ξ 2 + b 0 + c 0 + e 1 T W 1 e 1 e 2 T W 1 e 2 + ϖ 1 T W ϖ 1 ϖ 2 T W ϖ 2 + s y m { ϖ 31 T W L 1 Z 1 ( h 1 e 6 + e 11 ) + Z 2 ( h 2 e 7 e 12 ) } η 1 T S ˜ 1 η 1 ) ] ζ ( t ) = ζ T ( t ) Σ 1 ζ ( t ) , (17)

对于 h ( t ) [ h 1 , h 2 ] ,如果式(17)成立,那么 V ˙ ( t ) < 0 ,证明完成。

注4:条件(13)和(14)是为了确定 h ( t ) [ h 1 , h 2 ] 的三次函数的负性。然而,这不能直接使用现有的线性矩阵不等式(LMI)工具来解决。现使用引理3,使这些条件以LMI的形式呈现。

依据引理3,可得以下稳定性准则。

定理2 给定标量 h 1 , h 2 ,对于满足式(2)的系统(1)是渐近稳定的,如果存在对称正定矩阵 P R 5 n × 5 n W 1 R n × n W R 4 n × 4 n S 1 , S 2 R n × n ,对称矩阵 X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 , X 5 , X 6 R 3 n × 3 n ,任意矩阵 Z 1 , Z 2 R 12 n × n Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 , Y 5 , Y 6 R 3 n × 3 n ,使当 h ( t ) [ h 1 , h 2 ] 时,下述不等式成立,

h i 3 Π 3 + h i 2 Π 2 + h i Π 1 + Π 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h i 3 Π 3 + h i Π 1 + Π 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h i 2 Π 2 + h i Π 1 + Π 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h 2 3 Π 3 + h 2 2 Π 2 + h 2 Π 1 + Π 0 Π 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 ( 2 Π 3 h 2 + Π 3 h 1 + Π 2 ) < 0 ,

h i 3 Ψ 3 + h i 2 Ψ 2 + h i Ψ 1 + Ψ 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h i 3 Ψ 3 + h i Ψ 1 + Ψ 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h i 2 Ψ 2 + h i Ψ 1 + Ψ 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h 2 3 Ψ 3 + h 2 2 Ψ 2 + h 2 Ψ 1 + Ψ 0 Ψ 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 ( 2 Ψ 3 h 2 + Ψ 3 h 1 + Ψ 2 ) < 0.

为了评估本文引理5相对于现有方法的优越性,并验证本文方法的有效性和可行性,我们使用引理2对凸式进行估计,并结合引理4得到以下稳定性准则(定理3)。

定理3 给定标量 h 1 , h 2 ,对于满足式(2)的系统(1)是渐近稳定的,如果存在对称正定矩阵 P R 5 n × 5 n W 1 R n × n W R 4 n × 4 n S 1 , S 2 R n × n ,对称矩阵 X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 R 3 n × 3 n ,任意矩阵 Z 1 , Z 2 R 12 n × n Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 R 3 n × 3 n ,当 h ( t ) [ h 1 , h 2 ] 时,下述不等式成立,

h i 2 Π 2 + h i Π 1 + Π 0 < 0 i = 1 , 2 , h 1 2 Π 2 + h 1 Π 1 + Π 0 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 Π 2 < 0 , Ψ 0 < 0 , Ψ 2 + Ψ 1 + Ψ 0 < 0 , Ψ 0 Ψ 2 < 0.

5. 数值实例

在本节中,应用一个经常用到的数值例子来验证所提出的互凸三次矩阵不等式的优越性。考虑系统(1),该系统的参数如下:

A = [ 0 1.0 10 1.0 ] , B = [ 0 0.1 0.1 0.2 ] .

依据定理2,计算出给定h1对应的h2的最大上界,并将结果列于表1中。通过观察表格可以发现,定理2所提供的h2值相对较大。同时,本文依据定理3给出的相应的稳定性准则,同样计算出给定h1对应的h2的最大上界。通过数值实验的对比结果,不仅突显了互凸二次矩阵不等式的优越性,同时也彰显了互凸三次矩阵不等式的优势所在。

Table 1. Upper bound h2 given by h1

表1. h1给定下的上界h2

注5:数值模拟过程并不涉及实验参数的选择,因此,所得结果具有一般性。值得注意的是,我们不仅能够求解在满足定理设定的时滞最大允许上界,而且还能给出最大允许上界情况下的矩阵(即定理中设定的存在矩阵)。然而,所求解出的矩阵并不影响最大允许上界。因此,在本节中我们未提供这些矩阵的具体数值。

注6:本节所采用的仿真实验平台为MATLAB,其中内置的线性矩阵不等式(LMI)工具箱。

6. 结论

本文针对时变时滞系统的稳定性问题,提出了一个新的互凸三次矩阵不等式,并据此导出了保守性较低的稳定性准则。此外,给出了在互凸二次矩阵不等式下的稳定性准则,以验证互凸三次矩阵不等式的优越性。实验结果表明,所提出的方法具有可行性和优越性。

文章引用

樊天娇,杨艳梅. 基于三次函数不等式的时变时滞系统稳定性分析
Stability Analysis of Time-Varying Time-Delay Systems Based on Cubic Function Inequality[J]. 理论数学, 2024, 14(02): 557-568. https://doi.org/10.12677/PM.2024.142054

参考文献

  1. 1. Gyurkovics, É. (2015) A Note on Wirtinger-Type Integral Inequalities for Time-Delay Systems. Automatica, 61, 44-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.07.033

  2. 2. Fridman, E. (2001) New Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functionals for Stability of Linear Retarded and Neutral Type Systems. Systems and Control Letters, 43, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(01)00114-1

  3. 3. Zhang, H.G. and Liu, Z.W. (2011) Stability Analysis for Linear Delayed Systems via an Optimally Dividing Delay Interval Approach. Automatica, 47, 2126-2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2011.06.003

  4. 4. Gouaisbaut, F. and Peaucelle, D. (2006) Delay-Dependent Stability Analysis of Linear Time Delay Systems. IFAC Proceedings, 39, 54-59. https://doi.org/10.3182/20060710-3-IT-4901.00010

  5. 5. Han, Q.L. (2009) A Discrete Delay Decomposition Approach to Sta-bility of Linear Retarded and Neutral Systems. Automatica, 45, 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2008.08.005

  6. 6. Wang, C. and Shen, Y. (2011) Improved Delay-Dependent Robust Stability Criteria for Uncertain Time Delay Systems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, 2880-2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.08.031

  7. 7. Liu, P.L. (2012) A Delay Decomposition Approach to Robust Stability Analysis of Uncertain Systems with Time-Varying Delay. ISA Transactions, 51, 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2012.07.001

  8. 8. Chen, D., Liu, X.W. and Song, Y.L. (2022) Stability Analysis of Discrete-Time System with Slowly Time-Varying Delays. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.127

  9. 9. Li, H.F., Zhou, B., Hou, M.Z. and Duan, G.R. (2021) On the Time-Varying Halanay Inequality with Applications to Stability Analysis of Time-Delay Systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358, 5488-5512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.04.046

  10. 10. González, A. (2022) Improved Results on Stability Analysis of Time-Varying Delay Systems via Delay Partitioning Method and Finsler’s Lemma. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 359, 7632-7649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.07.032

  11. 11. Seuret, A. and Gouaisbaut, F. (2013) Jensen’s and Wirtinger’s Inequalities for Time-Delay Systems. IFAC Proceedings, 46, 343-348. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130204-3-FR-4031.00160

  12. 12. Seuret, A. and Gouaisbaut, F. (2013) Wirtinger-Based Integral Inequality: Application to Time-Delay Systems. Automatica, 49, 2860-2866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.05.030

  13. 13. Liu, K., Seuret, A. and Xia, Y.Q. (2017) Stability Analysis of Systems with Time-Varying Delays via the Second-Order Bessel-Legendre Inequality. Automatica, 76, 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.11.001

  14. 14. Cai, L., Xiong, L.L. and Zhang, H.Y. (2022) A Generalized Multiple Integral Inequality with Application to Time-Varying Delay Systems. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 1268-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.161

  15. 15. Gong, C., Zhang, X. and Wu, L.G. (2017) Multiple-Integral Inequalities to Stability Analysis of Linear Time-Delay Systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 354, 1446-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.11.036

  16. 16. Tian, J.K., Ren, Z.R. and Zhong, S.M. (2020) A New Integral Inequality and Application to Stability of Time-Delay Systems. Applied Mathematics Letters, 101, Article ID: 106058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.106058

  17. 17. Zhi, Y.L., He, Y., Zhang, C.K. and Wu, M. (2017) New Method for Stability of Systems with Time-Varying Delay via Improved Free-Matrix-Based Integral Inequality. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50, 1281-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.132

  18. 18. Zhao, X., Lin, C., Chen, B. and Wang, Q.G. (2019) Stability Analysis for Linear Time-Delay Systems Using New Inequality Based on the Second-Order Derivative. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356, 8770-8784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.03.038

  19. 19. Jin, L., He, Y. and Jiang, L. (2022) A Novel Integral Inequality and Its Application to Stability Analysis of Linear System with Multiple Time Delays. Applied Mathematics Letters, 124, Article ID: 107648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107648

  20. 20. Yang, B., Yan, Z.F., Pan, X.J. and Zhao, X.D. (2021) Improved Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Time-Varying Delays. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358, 7804-7824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.07.045

  21. 21. Krasovskii, N.N. (1963) Stability of Motion. Stanford University Press, San Francisco.

  22. 22. Park, P., Ko, J.W. and Jeong, C. (2011) Reciprocally Convex Approach to Stability of Systems with Time-Varying Delays. Automatica, 47, 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.10.014

  23. 23. Zhang, C.K., He, Y., Jiang, L. and Wu, M. (2016) An Improved Summation Inequality to Discrete-Time Systems with Time-Varying Delay. Automatica, 74, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.07.040

  24. 24. Zhang, X.M., Han, Q.L., Seuret, A. and Gouaisbaut, F. (2017) An Im-proved Reciprocally Convex Inequality and an Augmented Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functional for Stability of Linear Systems with Time-Varying Delay. Automatica, 84, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.04.048

  25. 25. Zeng, H.B., Lin, H.C., He, Y., Teo, K. and Wang, W. (2020) Hierarchical Stability Conditions for Time-Varying Delay Systems via an Extended Reciprocally Convex Quadratic Inequality. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 357, 9930-9941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.07.034

  26. 26. Sun, J., Liu, G.P., Chen, J. and Rees, D. (2010) Improved De-lay-Range-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Time-Varying Delays. Automatica, 46, 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.11.002

  27. 27. Lee, T.H. and Park, J.H. (2018) Improved Stability Conditions of Time-Varying Delay Systems Based on New Lyapunov Functionals. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 355, 1176-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.12.014

  28. 28. 昭准封, 刚陈. 基于三次函数不等式的时滞系统稳定性分析[J]. 控制工程, 2023, 30(7): 1242-1247.

  29. 29. Kim, J.H. (2016) Further Improvement of Jensen Inequality and Application to Stability of Time-Delayed Systems. Automatica, 64, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2015.08.025

  30. 30. Park, P., Lee, W.I. and Lee, S.Y. (2015) Auxiliary Function-Based Integral Inequalities for Quadratic Functions and Their Applications to Time-Delay Systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 352, 1378-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.01.004

附录

b 2 = s y m { e 1 T A T P 5 e 9 + e 1 T A T P 5 e 10 + e 1 T A T P 5 e 6 + e 3 T B T P 5 e 9 + e 3 T B T P 5 e 10 + e 3 T B T P 5 e 6 + e 1 T P 9 e 9 + e 1 T P 9 e 10 + e 1 T P 9 e 6 e 2 T P 9 e 9 e 2 T P 9 e 6 + e 2 T P 12 e 9 + e 2 T P 12 e 10 + e 2 T P 12 e 6 e 4 T P 12 e 9 e 4 T P 12 e 10 e 4 T P 12 e 6 + h 1 e 1 T P 14 e 9 + h 1 e 1 T P 14 e 10 + h 1 e 1 T P 14 e 6 h 1 e 5 T P 14 e 9 h 1 e 5 T P 14 e 10 h 1 e 5 T P 14 e 6 + ( h 2 h 1 ) e 9 T P 15 e 2 + ( h 2 h 1 ) e 10 T P 12 e 2 + ( h 2 h 1 ) e 6 T P 15 e 2 e 9 T P 15 e 11 e 9 T P 15 e 12 e 10 T P 15 e 11 e 10 T P 15 e 12 e 6 T P 15 e 11 e 6 T P 15 e 12 } ,

b 1 = s y m { 2 h 1 e 1 T A T P 5 e 9 2 h 2 e 1 T A T P 5 e 10 2 h 2 e 1 T A T P 5 e 6 2 h 1 e 3 T B T P 5 e 9 2 h 2 e 3 T B T P 5 e 10 2 h 2 e 3 T B T P 5 e 6 2 h 1 e 1 T P 9 e 9 2 h 2 e 1 T P 9 e 10 2 h 2 e 1 T P 9 e 6 + 2 h 1 e 2 T P 9 e 9 + 2 h 2 e 2 T P 9 e 10 + 2 h 2 e 2 T P 9 e 6 2 h 1 e 2 T P 12 e 9 2 h 2 e 2 T P 12 e 10 2 h 2 e 2 T P 12 e 6 + 2 h 1 e 4 T P 12 e 9 + 2 h 2 e 4 T P 12 e 10 + 2 h 2 e 4 T P 12 e 6 2 h 1 h 2 e 1 T P 14 e 10 2 h 1 h 2 e 1 T P 14 e 6 + 2 h 1 2 e 5 T P 14 e 9 + 2 h 1 h 2 e 5 T P 14 e 10 + 2 h 1 h 2 e 5 T P 14 e 6 2 h 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 10 T P 12 e 2 2 h 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 6 T P 15 e 2 + 2 h 1 e 9 T P 15 e 11 + 2 h 1 e 9 T P 15 e 12 + 2 h 2 e 10 T P 15 e 11 + 2 h 2 e 6 T P 15 e 11 + 2 h 2 e 6 T P 15 e 12 2 h 1 2 e 1 T P 14 e 9 2 h 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 9 T P 15 e 2 + 2 h 2 e 10 T P 15 e 12 } ,

b 0 = s y m { h 1 2 e 1 T A T P 5 e 9 + h 2 2 e 1 T A T P 5 e 10 + h 2 2 e 1 T A T P 5 e 6 + h 1 2 e 3 T B T P 5 e 9 + h 2 2 e 3 T B T P 5 e 10 + h 2 2 e 3 T B T P 5 e 6 + h 1 2 e 1 T P 9 e 9 + h 2 2 e 1 T P 9 e 10 + h 2 2 e 1 T P 9 e 6 h 1 2 e 2 T P 9 e 9 h 2 2 e 2 T P 9 e 10 h 2 2 e 2 T P 9 e 6 + h 1 2 e 2 T P 12 e 9 + h 2 2 e 2 T P 12 e 10 + h 2 2 e 2 T P 12 e 9 h 1 2 e 4 T P 12 e 9 h 2 2 e 4 T P 12 e 10 h 2 2 e 4 T P 12 e 6 + h 1 3 e 1 T P 14 e 9 + h 1 h 2 2 e 1 T P 14 e 10 + h 1 h 2 2 e 1 T P 14 e 6 h 1 3 e 5 T P 14 e 9 h 1 h 2 2 e 5 T P 14 e 10 h 1 h 2 2 e 5 T P 14 e 6 + h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 9 T P 15 e 2 + h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 10 T P 12 e 2 + h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 6 T P 15 e 2 h 1 2 e 9 T P 15 e 11 h 1 2 e 9 T P 15 e 12 h 2 2 e 10 T P 15 e 11 h 2 2 e 10 T P 15 e 12 h 2 2 e 6 T P 15 e 11 h 2 2 e 6 T P 15 e 12 } ,

Ξ 1 = s y m { e 1 T P 1 A e 1 + e 1 T P 1 B e 3 + h 1 e 1 T A T P 2 e 5 + h 1 e 3 T B T P 2 e 5 + e 1 T P 2 e 1 e 1 T P 2 e 2 + e 1 T A T P 3 e 11 + e 1 T A T P 3 e 12 + e 3 T B T P 3 e 11 + e 3 T B T P 3 e 12 + e 1 T P 3 e 2 e 1 T P 3 e 4 + h 1 2 e 1 T A T P 4 e 8 + h 1 2 e 3 T B T P 4 e 8 + h 1 e 1 T P 4 e 1 h 1 e 1 T P 4 e 5 + ( h 2 h 1 ) e 1 T P 5 e 2 e 1 T P 5 e 11 e 1 T P 5 e 12 + h 1 e 5 T P 6 e 1 h 1 e 5 T P 6 e 2 + e 1 T P 7 e 11 + e 1 T P 7 e 12 e 2 T P 7 e 11 e 2 T P 7 e 12 + h 1 e 5 T P 7 e 2 h 1 e 5 T P 7 e 4 + h 1 2 e 1 T P 8 e 8 h 1 2 e 2 T P 8 e 8

+ h 1 2 e 5 T P 8 e 1 h 1 2 e 5 T P 8 e 5 + h 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 5 T P 9 e 2 h 1 e 5 T P 9 e 11 h 1 e 5 T P 9 e 12 + e 11 T P 10 e 2 e 11 T P 10 e 4 + e 12 T P 10 e 2 e 12 T P 10 e 4 + h 1 2 e 2 T P 11 e 8 h 1 2 e 4 T P 11 e 8 + h 1 e 11 T P 11 e 1 + h 1 e 12 T P 11 e 1 h 1 e 11 T P 11 e 5 h 1 e 12 T P 11 e 5 + ( h 2 h 1 ) e 11 T P 12 e 2 + ( h 2 h 1 ) e 12 T P 12 e 2 e 11 T P 12 e 11 e 11 T P 12 e 12 e 12 T P 12 e 11 e 12 T P 12 e 12 + h 1 3 e 8 T P 13 e 1 h 1 3 e 8 T P 13 e 5 + h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) e 8 T P 14 e 2 h 1 2 e 8 T P 14 e 11 h 1 2 e 8 T P 14 e 12 } ,

ϖ 1 = [ e 2 T e 1 T 0 e 11 T + e 12 T ] T ,

ϖ 1 = [ e 4 T e 1 T e 11 T + e 12 T 0 ] T ,

ϖ 31 = [ e 11 T + e 12 T ( h 2 h 1 ) e 1 T h 1 2 e 9 T + h 2 2 e 10 T + h 2 e 11 T ( h 2 h 1 ) ( e 11 T + e 12 T ) h 1 2 e 9 T h 2 2 e 10 T h 2 e 11 T ] T ,

ϖ 32 = [ 0 0 2 h 1 e 9 T 2 h 2 e 10 T e 11 T 2 h 1 e 9 T + 2 h 2 e 10 T + e 11 T ] T ,

ϖ 33 = [ 0 0 e 9 T + e 10 T e 9 T e 10 T ] T ,

L 1 = [ 0 e 0 T e 2 T e 4 T ] T ,

Ξ 2 = h 1 2 e 1 T A T S 1 A e 1 + h 1 2 e 3 T B T S 1 B e 3 + h 1 2 s y m { e 1 T A T S 1 B e 3 } + ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 e 1 T A T S 2 A e 1 + ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 e 3 T B T S 2 B e 3 + ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 s y m { e 1 T A T S 2 B e 3 } ,

η 1 = [ e 1 e 2 e 1 + e 2 2 e 5 e 1 e 2 + 6 e 5 12 e 8 ] η 2 = [ e 2 e 3 e 2 + e 3 2 e 6 e 2 e 3 + 6 e 6 12 e 9 ] η 3 = [ e 3 e 4 e 3 + e 4 2 e 7 e 3 e 4 + 6 e 7 12 e 10 ] ,

S ˜ 1 = [ S 1 0 0 0 3 S 1 0 0 0 5 S 1 ] S ˜ 2 = [ S 2 0 0 0 3 S 2 0 0 0 5 S 2 ] ,

c 3 = 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 [ η 2 T X 5 η 2 η 3 T X 6 η 3 + s y m { η 2 T ( Y 6 Y 5 ) η 3 } ] ,

c 2 = 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 [ η 2 T X 3 η 2 + h 2 2 h 1 h 2 h 1 η 2 T X 5 η 2 + η 3 T X 4 η 3 + h 1 + 2 h 2 h 2 h 1 η 3 T X 6 η 3 + s y m { η 2 T ( Y 3 Y 4 ) η 3 + 3 h 1 h 2 h 1 η 2 T Y 5 η 3 3 h 2 h 2 h 1 η 2 T Y 6 η 3 } ] ,

c 1 = 1 h 2 h 1 [ η 2 T X 1 η 2 + ( h 1 + h 2 ) h 2 h 1 η 2 T X 3 η 2 + 2 h 1 h 2 + h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 2 T X 5 η 2 η 3 T X 2 η 3 h 2 + h 1 h 2 h 1 η 3 T X 4 η 3 h 2 2 + 2 h 1 h 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 3 T X 6 η 3 + s y m { η 2 T ( Y 2 Y 1 ) η 3 + 2 h 1 h 2 h 1 η 2 T Y 3 η 3 + 2 h 2 h 2 h 1 η 2 T Y 4 η 3 3 h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 2 T Y 5 η 3 + 3 h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 2 T Y 6 η 3 } ] ,

c 0 = η 2 T S ˜ 2 η 2 h 2 h 2 h 1 η 2 T X 1 η 2 + h 1 h 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 2 T X 3 η 2 h 1 2 h 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 η 2 T X 5 η 2 η 3 T S ˜ 2 η 3 + h 1 h 2 h 1 η 3 T X 2 η 3 + h 1 h 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 3 T X 4 η 3 + h 1 h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 η 3 T X 6 η 3 + s y m { h 1 h 2 h 1 η 2 T Y 1 η 3 h 2 h 2 h 1 η 2 T Y 2 η 3 h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 2 T Y 3 η 3 h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 η 2 T Y 4 η 3 + h 1 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 η 2 T Y 5 η 3 h 2 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 η 2 T Y 6 η 3 } ,

Ψ 3 = 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 [ X 5 Y 5 Y 6 X 6 ] ,

Ψ 2 = 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 [ X 3 3 h 1 h 2 h 1 X 5 Y 3 + Y 4 3 h 1 h 2 h 1 Y 5 + 3 h 2 h 2 h 1 Y 6 X 4 + 3 h 2 h 2 h 1 X 6 ] ,

Ψ 1 = 1 h 2 h 1 [ X 1 2 h 1 h 2 h 1 X 3 + 3 h 1 2 X 5 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 Y 1 Y 2 + 2 h 1 Y 3 2 h 2 Y 4 h 2 h 1 + 3 h 1 2 Y 5 3 h 2 2 Y 6 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 X 2 2 h 2 h 2 h 1 X 4 3 h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 X 6 ] ,

Ψ 0 = [ Ψ 011 Ψ 012 Ψ 012 T Ψ 022 ] ,

Ψ 011 = S ˜ 2 h 1 h 2 h 1 X 1 + h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 X 3 h 1 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 X 5 ,

Ψ 012 = h 1 h 2 h 1 Y 1 + h 2 h 2 h 1 Y 2 + h 1 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 Y 3 + h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 Y 4 h 1 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 Y 5 + h 2 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 Y 6 ,

Ψ 022 = S ˜ 2 + h 2 h 2 h 1 X 2 + h 2 2 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 X 4 + h 2 3 ( h 2 h 1 ) 3 X 6 ,

Σ 1 = h 3 ( t ) Π 3 + h 2 ( t ) Π 2 + h ( t ) Π 1 + Π 0 ,

Π 3 = c 3 2 = b 2 + c 2 + ϖ 33 T W L 1 Π 1 = b 1 + c 1 + ϖ 32 T W L 1 + s y m { Z 1 e 6 Z 2 e 7 } ,

Π 0 = Ξ 1 + Ξ 2 + b 0 + c 0 + e 1 T W 1 e 1 e 2 T W 1 e 2 + ϖ 1 T W ϖ 1 ϖ 2 T W ϖ 2 η 1 T S ˜ 1 η 1 + s y m { ϖ 31 T R L 1 Z 1 ( h 1 e 6 + e 11 ) + Z 2 ( h 2 e 7 e 12 ) } ,

Π 2 = b 2 + d 2 + ϖ 33 T W L 1 ,

Π 1 = b 1 + d 1 + ϖ 32 T W L 1 ,

Π 0 = Ξ 1 + Ξ 2 + b 0 + d 0 + e 1 T W 1 e 1 e 2 T W 1 e 2 + ϖ 1 T W ϖ 1 ϖ 2 T W ϖ 2 + s y m { ϖ 31 T W L 1 } η 1 T S ˜ 1 η 1 ,

d 2 = 1 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 [ η 2 T X 3 η 2 + η 3 T X 4 η 3 + s y m { η 2 T ( Y 3 Y 4 ) η 3 } ] ,

d 1 = 1 h 2 h 1 [ η 2 T X 1 η 2 h 1 + h 2 h 2 h 1 η 2 T X 3 η 2 η 3 T X 2 η 3 h 1 + h 2 h 2 h 1 η 3 T X 4 η 3 + s y m { η 2 T ( Y 1 + Y 2 + 2 h 1 Y 3 + 2 h 2 Y 4 h 2 h 1 ) η 3 } ] ,

d 0 = η 2 T ( S ˜ 2 h 2 X 3 h 2 h 1 ) η 2 + η 3 T ( S ˜ 2 + h 1 X 2 h 2 h 1 + h 1 h 2 X 4 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 ) η 3 + s y m { η 2 T ( h 1 Y 1 h 2 Y 2 h 2 h 1 h 1 2 Y 3 + h 2 2 Y 4 ( h 2 h 1 ) 2 ) ) η 3 } ,

Ψ 2 = [ X 3 Y 3 + Y 4 X 4 ] Ψ 1 = [ X 1 Y 1 Y 2 2 Y 4 X 2 2 X 4 ] Ψ 0 = [ S ˜ 2 Y 2 + Y 4 S ˜ 2 + X 2 + X 4 ] .

期刊菜单