﻿ 基于层次分析法的通信指挥效能评估方法 Evaluation Method of Communication and Command Effectiveness Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process

Modeling and Simulation
Vol.05 No.03(2016), Article ID:18311,7 pages
10.12677/MOS.2016.53013

Evaluation Method of Communication and Command Effectiveness Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process

Yuanzi Xu, Dengdi Liu, Zhiwei Zhang, Kungang Yuan, Daogang Jiang

Air Force Command College University, Beijing

Received: Jul. 25th, 2016; accepted: Aug. 14th, 2016; published: Aug. 17th, 2016

ABSTRACT

An evaluation method of communication command effectiveness based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed in this paper. To solve the issue of consistency of judgment matrix adjustment problem, a two-stage adjustment method is proposed. Firstly, construct the consistency matrix, and calculate the maximum deviation elements of the original judgment matrix comparing to the consistency matrix. Secondly, define the adjustment rules, and iteratively adjust the maximum deviation elements according to the rules. Finally, a communication and command effectiveness assessment instance is calculated to validate our method. The calculation results prove that our effectiveness evaluation method can solve the problem conveniently and efficiently, and can maximum retain the original expert opinion.

Keywords:Analytical Hierarchy Process, Effectiveness Evaluation, Communication and Command Effectiveness, Consistency Adjustment

1. 引言

2. 相关工作

3. 基于层次分析法的通信指挥效能评估方法

3.1. 问题求解框架

3.2. 判断矩阵的一致性调整方法

3.2.1. 构造完全一致性矩阵并发现不符合一致性的元素

3.2.2. 构造修正矩阵

Algorithm 1. Two-stage consistency adjustment algorithm

3.3. 通信指挥效能评估算例

Figure 1. Structure table of communication and command effectiveness evaluation

;

;

;

;

4. 结论

Evaluation Method of Communication and Command Effectiveness Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. 建模与仿真, 2016, 05(03): 98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2016.53013

1. 1. 蹇成刚, 周万宁, 董亚卓. 基于仿真的指挥信息系统效能评估框架研究[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2013, 35(6): 137- 141.

2. 2. 许树柏. 层次分析法[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 1989.

3. 3. 韦灼彬, 吴森, 王怀峰. 基于改进层次分析法的机场道面综合评价[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2010, 29(4): 13-16.

4. 4. 李杨, 韦伟, 刘永忠, 等. 一种基于AHP的信息安全威胁评估模型研究[J]. 计算机科学, 2012, 39(1): 61-64.

5. 5. 刘相利. 层次分析法的一致性改进及其应用[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2015, 38(5): 5-9.

6. 6. 严世华, 田效. 基于层次分析法的判断矩阵一致性调整方法[J]. 兵工自动化, 2008, 27(4): 8-10.

7. 7. Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A. (2011) Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14336-14345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

8. 8. 张建东, 杨进, 刘才铭, 李彬. 改进的AHP算法在Web机群系统负载均衡中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(7): 93-97.

9. 9. Chan, F. and Kumar, N. (2015) Searching for Consensus in AHP Group Decision Making: A Bayesian Perspective. http://www.ima.udg.es/Activitats/CoDaWork05

10. 10. 陈伟. 一种采用拓广最小二乘法的模糊综合评价方法[J]. 计算机仿真, 2009(2): 131-134.

11. 11. 牛丽, 陈珂, 程媛. 改进的层次分析法在就业综合评价中的应用[J]. 计算机仿真, 2011, 28(5): 376-379.

12. 12. 王建, 黄凤岗, 景韶光. AHP中判断矩阵一致性调整方法研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2005(8): 16-20.

13. 13. 江正华. AHP中正互反判断矩阵一致性调整的新方法[J]. 南京大学学报(数学半年刊), 2013, 30(2): 224-237.

14. 14. Ishizaka, A. (2004) Advantages of Clusters and Pivots in AHP. University of Basel, Switzerland.

15. 15. Ishizaka, A. (2004) Development of an Intelligent Tutoring System for AHP. Basel.

16. 16. 江文奇. AHP判断矩阵调整中的一致性问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2007, 16(6): 94-96.