目的:探讨中心静脉–动脉二氧化碳分压差(Pcv-aCO2)联合下腔静脉塌陷指数(cIVC)监测对高危手术患者液体复苏的指导意义。方法:选取2018年06月~2019年12月山东省立医院ICU收治的86例高危外科术后合并休克的患者为研究对象,随机编入观察组与对照组。入组后常规留置中心静脉导管,按照早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)方案进行液体复苏,对照组以Pcv-aCO2为目标指导液体复苏,观察组以Pcv-aCO2联合cIVC为目标指导液体复苏。对比两组患者液体复苏前及复苏6 h后病人的HR、MAP、CVP、ScvO2、Pcv-aCO2、Lac及Lac清除率、尿量等监测指标变化,以及EGDT达标率、术后并发症发生率、28天死亡率差异。结果:液体复苏6 h后,两组患者HR、MAP、CVP、ScvO2、Pcv-aCO2、Lac较复苏前显著改善(P < 0.05),其中对照组CVP明显高于观察组(P < 0.05),而观察组的Lac水平较对照组更低,Lac清除率也明显高于对照组(P < 0.05),HR、MAP、ScvO2、Pcv-aCO2、尿量及EGDT达标率比较无显著差异(P > 0.05)。观察组术后并发症的发生率较对照组显著下降(P < 0.05),28天死亡率也小于对照组,但两组间比较无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:Pcv-aCO2联合cIVC监测在指导高危手术患者液体复苏中有更好的应用价值,能更有效地改善患者组织灌注,纠正细胞缺氧,同时避免过度补液加重病情;两者均达标,乳酸清除率最高,术后并发症发生率最低。 Objective: To investigate the value of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (Pcv-aCO2) combined with collapse index of inferior vena cava (cIVC) monitoring in guiding fluid resuscitation in high-risk surgery patients. Methods: A total of 86 cases of high-risk postoperative patients with shock admitted to the ICU of Shandong Provincial Hospital from June 2018 to December 2019 were selected as the study objects, and were randomly divided into the Observation group and the Control group, with 43 cases in each group. The general indwelling central venous catheter was performed on the patients after their enrollment. Fluid resuscitation was initiated according to the early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) protocol for patients with shock. Fluid resuscitation in the control group was guided with the goal of Pcv-aCO2. Fluid resuscitation in the observation group was guided with the goal of Pcv-aCO2 combined with cIVC. The differences in HR, MAP, CVP, urine volume, ScvO2, Pcv-aCO2, Lac, LCR before and 6 h after fluid resuscitation, as well as EGDT compliance rate, postoperative complication rate and 28-day mortality were compared between the 2 groups. Results: After 6 h of fluid resuscitation, HR, MAP, CVP, ScvO2, Pcv-aCO2 and Lac in the 2 groups were significantly improved compared with those before resuscitation (P < 0.05). The CVP in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The Lac level in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the LCR was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR, MAP, ScvO2, Pcv-aCO2, urine volume, and EGDT compliance rate (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the 28-day mortality rate was also lower than that in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pcv-aCO2 combined with cIVC monitoring has a better application value in guiding fluid resuscitation in patients with high-risk surgery, which can effectively improve tissue perfusion, correct cell hypoxia, and avoid the aggravation of disease caused by excessive fluid infusion. Both comply with the requirement, with the highest lactate clearance rate and the lowest incidence of postoperative complications.
高危手术,液体复苏,中心静脉–动脉二氧化碳分压差(Pcv-aCO2),下腔静脉塌陷指数(cIVC), The High-Risk Surgery Fluid Resuscitation Central Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (Pcv-aCO2) Collapse Index of Inferior Vena Cava (cIVC)Pcv-aCO2联合下腔静脉塌陷指数监测 对高危手术患者液体复苏的指导意义
李鹏程,郇 铖,孟昭丽,郄国强,王 鹏,王玉萍,任宏生. Pcv-aCO2联合下腔静脉塌陷指数监测对高危手术患者液体复苏的指导意义Significance of Pcv-aCO2 Combined with Collapse Index of Inferior Vena Cava Monitoring in Guiding Fluid Resuscitation in High-Risk Surgery Patients[J]. 临床医学进展, 2020, 10(03): 346-353. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2020.103055
参考文献ReferencesAckland, G.L., Iqbal, S., Paredes, L.G., et al. (2015) Individualised Oxygen Delivery Targeted Haemodynamic Therapy in High-Risk Surgical Patients: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled, Mechanistic Trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 3, 33-41. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70205-XParker, T., Brealey, D. and Dyson, A. (2019) Optimising Organ Perfusion in the High-Risk Surgical and Critical Care Patient: A Narrative Review. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 123, 170-176. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.027Dellinger, R.P., Levy, M.M., Rhodes, A., et al. (2013) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012. Critical Care Medicine, 41, 580-637. <br>https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83afFutier, E., Robin, E., Jabaudon, M., et al. (2010) Central Venous O? Saturation and Venous-to-Arterial CO? Difference as Complementary Tools for Goal-Directed Therapy during High-Risk Surgery. Critical Care, 14, R193. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9310Lee, C.W. and Kory, P.D. (2016) Development of a Fluid Resuscitation Pro-tocol Using Inferior Vena Cava and Lung Ultrasound. Journal of Critical Care, 31, 96-100. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.016Preau, S., Bortolotti, P., Colling, D., et al. (2017) Diagnostic Ac-curacy of the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients with Sepsis and Acute Circulatory Failure. Critical Care Medicine, 45, e290-e297. <br>https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002090Malbouisson, L.M.S., Silva, J.M., Carmona, M.J.C., et al. (2017) A Pragmatic Multi-Center Trial of Goal-Directed Fluid Management Based on Pulse Pressure Variation Moni-toring during High-Risk Surgery. BMC Anesthesiology, 17, 70. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0356-9Airapetian, N., Maizel, J., Alyamani, O., et al. (2015) Does Inferior Vena Cava Respiratory Variability Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients? Critical Care, 19, 400. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9Muller, L., Bobbia, X., Toumi, M., et al. (2012) Respiratory Variations of Inferior Vena Cava Diameter to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure: Need for a Cautious Use. Critical Care, 16, R188. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11672Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., et al. (2001) Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1368-1377. <br>https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010307Londo?o, J., Ni?o, C., Díaz, J., et al. (2018) Association of Clinical Hypoperfusion Variables with Lactate Clearance and Hospital Mortality. Shock, 50, 286-292. <br>https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001066Lees, N. and Hamilton, M. (2009) Clinical Review: Goal-Directed Therapy in High Risk Surgical Patients. Critical Care, 13, 231. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8039Daviaud, F., Grimaldi, D., Dechartres, A., et al. (2015) Timing and Causes of Death in Septic Shock. Annals of Intensive Care, 5, 16. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0058-8Bednarczyk, J.M., Fridfinnson, J.A., Kumar, A., et al. (2017) Incorporating Dynamic Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness into Goal-Directed Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Critical Care Medicine, 45, 1538-1545. <br>https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002554Wu, J., Wang, Z., Wang, T., et al. (2018) Evaluation of the Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Septic Shock by Ultrasound plus the Passive Leg Raising Test. Journal of Surgical Research, 224, 207-214. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.014Cecconi, M., De Backer, D., Antonelli, M., et al. (2014) Consensus on Circulatory Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring. Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Medicine, 40, 1795-1815. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z肖岳, 王洪桥, 赵同礼, 牛柳卉, 朱玉. 感染性休克患者预后与早期血乳酸清除率的关系[J]. 内科急危重症杂志, 2016, 22(2): 127-128+143.Zollo, A.M., Ayoob, A.L., Prittie, J.E., et al. (2019) Utility of Admission Lactate Concentration, Lactate Variables, and Shock Index in Outcome Assessment in Dogs Diagnosed with Shock. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, 29, 505-513. <br>https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12868Bolvardi, E., Malmir, J., Reihani, H., et al. (2016) The Role of Lactate Clearance as a Predictor of Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Patients with Severe Sepsis. Materia Socio Medica, 28, 57-60. <br>https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2016.28.57-60Zhou, X., Liu, D., Su, L., et al. (2017) Use of Stepwise Lactate Kinetics-Oriented Hemodynamic Therapy Could Improve the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Sepsis-Associated Hyperlactatemia. Critical Care, 21, 33. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1617-1Nguyen, H.B., Jaehne, A.K., Jayaprakash, N., et al. (2016) Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Insights and Comparisons to Process, Promise, and Arise. Critical Care, 20, 160. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1288-3Lu, Y., Zhang, H., Teng, F., et al. (2018) Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 33, 296-309. <br>https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066616671710Chen, Z.H., Jin, C.D., Chen, S., et al. (2017) The Application of Early Goal Directed Therapy in Patients during Burn Shock Stage. International Journal of Burns and Trauma, 7, 27-33.Protti, A., Masson, S., Latini, R., et al. (2018) Per-sistence of Central Venous Oxygen Desaturation During Early Sepsis Is Associated with Higher Mortality: A Retro-spective Analysis of the ALBIOS Trial. Chest, 154, 1291-1300. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.043Wittayachamnankul, B., Chentanakij, B. and Sruamsiri, K. (2016) The Role of Central Venous Oxygen Saturation, Blood Lactate, and Central Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference as a Goal and Prognosis of Sepsis Treatment. Journal of Critical Care, 36, 223-229. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.002Araujo, D.T., Felice, V.B. and Meregalli, A.F. (2019) Value of Central Venous to Arterial CO Difference after Early Goal-directed Therapy in Septic Shock Patients. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 23, 449-453. <br>https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23262Muller, G., Mercier, E., Vignon, P., et al. (2017) Prognostic Significance of Central Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference during the First 24 Hours of Septic Shock in Patients with and without Impaired Cardiac Function. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 119, 239-248. <br>https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex131Gao, W., Zhang, Y., Ni, H., et al. (2018) Prognostic Value of Difference between Peripheral Venous and Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Patients with Septic Shock: A Pilot Study. Journal of Southern Medical University, 38, 1312-1317.霍丽坤, 李培军. 中心静脉-动脉血二氧化碳分压差的临床应用进展[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2016, 28(11): 1048-1052.Robin, E., Futier, E., Pires, O., et al. (2015) Central Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference as a Prognostic Tool in High-Risk Surgical Patients. Critical Care, 19, 227. <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0917-6Helmy, T.A. and El-Reweny, E.M. (2017) Prognostic Value of Venous to Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference during Early Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 21, 589-593. <br>https://doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_64_16Guo, Z., Yin, M., Kong, J., et al. (2019) Relationship Analysis of Central Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference and Cardiac Index for Septic Shock. Scientific Reports, 9, 8822. <br>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45252-6Zhu, W., Wan, L., Wan, X., et al. (2016) Measurement of Brachial Artery Velocity Variation and Inferior Vena Cava Variability to Estimate Fluid Responsiveness. Chinese Critical Care Medicine, 28, 713-717.Thanakitcharu, P. and Charoenwut, M. (2013) Inferior Vena Cava Diameter and Collapsibility Index: A Practical Non-Invasive Evaluation of Intravascular Fluid Volume in Critically-Ill Patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 96, S14-S22.王小亭, 刘大为, 于凯江, 管向东, 马晓春, 严静, 康焰, 艾宇航, 胡振杰. 中国重症超声专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2016, 55(11): 900-912.?elebi Yamano?lu, N.G., Yamano?lu, A., Parlak, ?., et al. (2015) The Role of Inferior Vena Cava Diameter in Volume Status Monitoring, the Best Sonographic Measurement Method? American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 33, 433-438. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.014何志权, 伍伟光. 下腔静脉塌陷指数(cIVC)与循环衰竭患者的容量反应相关性[J]. 生物医学工程学进展, 2016, 37(2): 75-77.麦叶, 黄钰财, 贺志飚, 李瑞. 下腔静脉塌陷指数预测循环衰竭患者的容量反应性[J]. 医学综述, 2015(13): 2438-2440.