目的:系统评价机器人甲状腺切除术(Robotic thyroidectomy, RT)与传统开放性手术(Conventional open thyroidectomy, COT)治疗甲状腺疾病的临床有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、EMbase数据库、the Cochrane Library、循证医学临床参考数据库和中国知网、万方、维普等数据库,检索时间为建立数据库至2022年4月,采用RevMan4.2软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入13篇文献,共计6536例患者。Meta分析结果显示:与COT组比较,RT组手术时间比较差异有统计学意义[MD = 52.74, 95% CI (23.58, 81.91), P = 0.0004],患者年龄比较,其差异有统计学意义[MD = −4.94, 95% CI (−7.99, −1.88), P = 0.002],中央淋巴结清扫数目比较,其差异有统计学意义[MD = −1.76, 95% CI (−3.18, −0.34), P = 0.02];在肿瘤直径、住院时间、术后6个月血清Tg测定水平、乳糜漏、短暂性低钙血症、永久性低钙血症、短暂性喉返神经损伤、永久性喉返神经损伤比较中,其差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:机器人甲状腺切除术可以作为一种有效的手术方式,其术后并发症较COT相比无明显差异,且能在治疗的同时兼顾美容效果,提高患者的术后生活质量。
Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and conven-tional open thyroidectomy (COT) in the treatment of thyroid disease. Methods: The computer was searched for Pubmed, EMbase database, the Cochrane Library, evidence-based medical clinical ref-erence database, and China Knowledge Network, Wanfang, Weipu and other databases. The search time was to establish the database until April 2022, and Meta analysis was performed using RevMan4.2 software. Results: A total of 13 literatures were included, with a total of 6536 patients. Meta analysis results show that compared with the COT group, the RT group has a statistically sig-nificant difference in surgical time [MD = 52.74, 95% CI (23.58, 81.91), P = 0.0004], and the age of the patients has a statistically significant difference [MD = −4.94, 95% CI (−7.99, −1.88), P = 0.002], compared with the number of central lymph node dissections, the difference is statistically signifi-cant [MD = −1.76, 95% CI (−3.18, −0.34), P = 0.02]; in tumor diameter, length of hospital stay, se-rum Tg measurement level 6 months after surgery, chyle leakage, transient hypocalcemia, perma-nent hypocalcemia, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, permanent laryngeal recurrence, there was no significant difference in nerve injury comparison (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Robotic thy-roidectomy can be used as an effective surgical method. The postoperative complications are not significantly different from those of COT, and it can take into account the cosmetic effects while im-proving the quality of patients’ postoperative life.
机器人甲状腺切除术,传统开放性甲状腺切除术,Meta分析, Robotic Thyroidectomy Conventional Open Thyroidectomy Meta Analysis摘要
目的:系统评价机器人甲状腺切除术(Robotic thyroidectomy, RT)与传统开放性手术(Conventional open thyroidectomy, COT)治疗甲状腺疾病的临床有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、EMbase数据库、the Cochrane Library、循证医学临床参考数据库和中国知网、万方、维普等数据库,检索时间为建立数据库至2022年4月,采用RevMan4.2软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入13篇文献,共计6536例患者。Meta分析结果显示:与COT组比较,RT组手术时间比较差异有统计学意义[MD = 52.74, 95% CI (23.58, 81.91), P = 0.0004],患者年龄比较,其差异有统计学意义[MD = −4.94, 95% CI (−7.99, −1.88), P = 0.002],中央淋巴结清扫数目比较,其差异有统计学意义[MD = −1.76, 95% CI (−3.18, −0.34), P = 0.02];在肿瘤直径、住院时间、术后6个月血清Tg测定水平、乳糜漏、短暂性低钙血症、永久性低钙血症、短暂性喉返神经损伤、永久性喉返神经损伤比较中,其差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:机器人甲状腺切除术可以作为一种有效的手术方式,其术后并发症较COT相比无明显差异,且能在治疗的同时兼顾美容效果,提高患者的术后生活质量。
关键词
机器人甲状腺切除术,传统开放性甲状腺切除术,Meta分析
A Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Robotic Thyroidectomy and Conventional Open Thyroidectomy
Juan Cui1, Xuemei Cui2, Tingting Wang1, Dechun Qin1*
1Department of Nursing, Weifang People’s Hospital, Weifang Shandong
Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in the treatment of thyroid disease. Methods: The computer was searched for Pubmed, EMbase database, the Cochrane Library, evidence-based medical clinical reference database, and China Knowledge Network, Wanfang, Weipu and other databases. The search time was to establish the database until April 2022, and Meta analysis was performed using RevMan4.2 software. Results: A total of 13 literatures were included, with a total of 6536 patients. Meta analysis results show that compared with the COT group, the RT group has a statistically significant difference in surgical time [MD = 52.74, 95% CI (23.58, 81.91), P = 0.0004], and the age of the patients has a statistically significant difference [MD = −4.94, 95% CI (−7.99, −1.88), P = 0.002], compared with the number of central lymph node dissections, the difference is statistically significant [MD = −1.76, 95% CI (−3.18, −0.34), P = 0.02]; in tumor diameter, length of hospital stay, serum Tg measurement level 6 months after surgery, chyle leakage, transient hypocalcemia, permanent hypocalcemia, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, permanent laryngeal recurrence, there was no significant difference in nerve injury comparison (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Robotic thyroidectomy can be used as an effective surgical method. The postoperative complications are not significantly different from those of COT, and it can take into account the cosmetic effects while improving the quality of patients’ postoperative life.
Keywords:Robotic Thyroidectomy, Conventional Open Thyroidectomy, Meta Analysis
崔 娟,崔雪梅,王婷婷,秦德春. 机器人甲状腺切除术与传统开放性甲状腺手术临床疗效的Meta分析 A Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Robotic Thyroidectomy and Conventional Open Thyroidectomy[J]. 护理学, 2022, 11(06): 763-775. https://doi.org/10.12677/NS.2022.116118
参考文献References鲍萍萍, 龚杨明, 彭鹏, 等. 2014年上海市恶性肿瘤发病和死亡特征分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(3): 161-176.
<br>https://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.03.001田文. 达芬奇机器人甲状腺切除术的现状与发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 13-16.
<br>https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.01.004Chang, E.H.E., Kim, H.Y., Koh, Y.W. and Chung, W.Y. (2017) Overview of Robotic Thyroidecomy. Gland Surgery, 6, 218-228. <br>https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.03.18Lobe, T.E. and Wright, S.K. (2005) Novel Uses of Surgical Robotics in Headand Neck Surgery. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 15, 647-652. <br>https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2005.15.647Kang, S.W., Jeong, J.J., Yun, J.S., et al. (2009) Robotic-Asssisted Endoscopiv Surgery for Thyroid Cancer: Experience with the First 100 Patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 23, Article No. 2399. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0366-xPaek, S.H., Kang, K.H. and Park, S.J. (2018) A Compari-son of Robotic versus Open Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percu-taneous Techniques, 28, 170-173.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000529Woo, J.-W., Kim, S.K., Park, I., et al. (2016) A Novel Ro-botic Surgical Technique for Thyroid Surgery: Bilateral Axillary Approach (BAA). Surgical Endoscopy, 31, 317-339. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5018-3Lee, J., Kwon, I.S., Bae, E.H. and Chung, W.Y. (2013) Compara-tive Analysis of Oncological Outcomes and Quality of Life after Robotic versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy with Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and Lateral Neck Node Metastases. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 98, 2701-2708. <br>https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1583Lee, J., et al. (2011) Comparison of Endoscopic and Robotic Thyroidectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 8, 1439-1446. <br>https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1486-1Tae, K., Song, C.M., Ji, Y.B., et al. (2014) Comparison of Surgi-cal Completeness between Robotic Total Thyroidectomy versus Open Thyroidectomy. The Laryngoscope, 124, 1042-1047. <br>https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24511Lee, S., Ryu, H.R., Park, J.H., et al. (2012) Early Surgical Outcomes Comparison between Robotic and Conventional Open Thyroid Surgery for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Surgery, 151, 724-730.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.12.013Ji, Y.B., et al. (2014) Long-Term Cosmetic Outcomes after Robot-ic/Endoscopic Thyroidectomy by a Gasless Unilateral Axillo-Breast or Axillary Approach. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 24, 248-253.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2013.0459Kim, S.K., Woo, J.W., Park, I., et al. (2016) Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic versus Endoscopic Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach (BABA) Thyroidectomy in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 402, 578-586. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1528-7Lee, S., Lee, C.R., Lee, S.C., et al. (2014) Surgical Completeness of Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Comparison with Conventional Open Thyroidectomy in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 1068-1075. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3303-yLira, R.B., Chulam, T.C. and Kowalski, L.P. (2018) Variations and Results of Retroauricular Robotic Thyroid Surgery Associated or Not with Neck Dissection. Gland Surgery, 7, S42-S52. <br>https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.03.04Garstka, M., Mohsin, K., Ali, D.B., et al. (2018) Well-Differentated Thyroid Cancer and Robotic Transaxillary Surgery at a North American Institution. Journal of Surgi-cal Research, 228, 170-178. <br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.030Cho, J.N., Park, W.S., Min, S.Y., et al. (2016) Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Thyroidectomy vs. Conventional Open Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Car-cinoma. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14, Article No. 181.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0929-y贺青卿, 朱见, 范子义, 等. 达芬奇机器人腋乳径路与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺微小癌的对照研究[J]. 中国外科杂志, 2016, 54(1): 51-55. <br>https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.01.013Kang, S.W., Jeong, J.J., Yun, J.S., et al. (2009) Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery for Thyroid Cancer: Experience with the First 100 Patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 23, 2399-2406. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0366-xTae, K., Ji, Y.B., Jeong, J.H., et al. (2010) Robotic Thyroidectomy by a Gasless Unilateral Axillo-Breast or Axillary Approach: Our Early Experiences. Surgical Endoscopy, 25, 221-228. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1163-2Ban, E.J., Yoo, J.Y., Kim, W.W., et al. (2014) Sur-gical Complications after Robotic Thyroidectomy for Thyroid Carcinoma: A Single Center Experience with 3000 Patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 2555-2563.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1163-2Kim, B.S., Kang, K.H. and Park, S.J. (2014) Robotic Modified Radical Neck Dissection by Bilateral Axillary Breast Approach for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Lateral Neck Me-tastasis. Head & Neck, 37, 37-45.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23545沈洁芳, 郭健, 黄海燕, 严佶祺. 达芬奇机器人辅助下甲状腺手术的体位护理探讨[J]. 上海护理, 2018, 18(9): 61-63. <br>https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2018.09.016Byeon, H.K., Kim, D.H., Chang, J.W., et al. (2015) Comprehensive Application of Robotic Retroauricula Thyroidectomy: The Evolution of Robotic Thyroidectomy. The Laryngoscope, 126, 1952-1957.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25763Kang, S.W., Lee, S.H., Ryu, H.R., et al. (2010) Initial Experience with Robot-Assisted Modified Radical Neck Dissection for the Management of Thyroid Carcinoma with Lateral Neck Node Metastasis. Surgery, 148, 1214-1221.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.09.016Erbil, Y., Barbaros, U., Salmaslioglu, A., et al. (2008) Determina-tion of Remnant Thyroid Volume: Comparison of Ultrasonography, Radioactive Iodine Uptake and Serum Thy-roid-Stimulating Hormone Level. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 122, 615-622. <br>https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107008997Perrier, N.D., Randolph, G.W., Inabnet, W.B., Marple, B.F., et al. (2010) Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Framework for New Technology Assessment and Safe Implementation. Thyroid, 20, 1327-1332.
<br>https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2010.1666Kim, W.W., Kim, J.S., Hur, S.M., et al. (2011) Is Robotic Surgery Su-perior to Endoscopic and Open Surgeries in Thyroid Cancer. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 779-784. <br>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0960-7